25 changed files with 570 additions and 130 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,243 @@ |
|||||||
|
# NestJS Implementation Review |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Overview |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This review analyzes the TypeScript + NestJS implementation of the AutoStore application, focusing on adherence to Clean Architecture principles, SOLID principles, and the critical requirement of maintaining a **single source of truth** for domain knowledge. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Architecture Assessment |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### ✅ Strengths |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 1. Clean Architecture Implementation |
||||||
|
The implementation successfully follows Clean Architecture with clear layer separation: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Domain Layer**: Pure business logic with entities, value objects, and specifications |
||||||
|
- **Application Layer**: Use cases, commands, queries, and infrastructure interfaces |
||||||
|
- **Infrastructure Layer**: Concrete implementations (repositories, HTTP services, auth) |
||||||
|
- **Presentation Layer**: Controllers and API endpoints |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 2. Specification Pattern Implementation |
||||||
|
**Excellent implementation** of the Specification pattern for maintaining single source of truth: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```typescript |
||||||
|
// Domain specification - SINGLE SOURCE OF TRUTH |
||||||
|
export class ItemExpirationSpec { |
||||||
|
isExpired(item: ItemEntity, currentTime: Date): boolean { |
||||||
|
return this.getSpec(currentTime).match(item); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
getSpec(currentTime: Date): SimpleSpecification<ItemEntity> { |
||||||
|
return new SimpleSpecification<ItemEntity>( |
||||||
|
Spec.lte('expirationDate', currentTime.toISOString()) |
||||||
|
); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This ensures that the expiration logic (`date <= now`) is defined **only once** in the domain layer and reused throughout the application. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 3. Value Objects and Entities |
||||||
|
Proper implementation of Domain-Driven Design patterns: |
||||||
|
- **Value Objects**: [`ItemId`](src/domain/value-objects/item-id.vo.ts:1), [`UserId`](src/domain/value-objects/user-id.vo.ts:1), [`ExpirationDate`](src/domain/value-objects/expiration-date.vo.ts:1) |
||||||
|
- **Entities**: [`ItemEntity`](src/domain/entities/item.entity.ts:1) with proper encapsulation |
||||||
|
- **Immutability**: Value objects are immutable with defensive copying |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 4. Dependency Inversion |
||||||
|
Excellent use of dependency injection and interface segregation: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```typescript |
||||||
|
// Application layer depends on abstractions |
||||||
|
export interface IItemRepository { |
||||||
|
findWhere(specification: ISpecification<ItemEntity>): Promise<ItemEntity[]>; |
||||||
|
// ... other methods |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 5. Repository Pattern with Specifications |
||||||
|
The [`FileItemRepository`](src/infrastructure/repositories/file-item-repository.ts:114) properly implements the specification pattern: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```typescript |
||||||
|
async findWhere(specification: ISpecification<ItemEntity>): Promise<ItemEntity[]> { |
||||||
|
// Uses domain specifications for filtering |
||||||
|
if (specification.isSatisfiedBy(item)) { |
||||||
|
matchingItems.push(item); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 6. Background Processing |
||||||
|
The implementation now includes background processing using NestJS's built-in scheduler: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**New Implementation**: [`ExpiredItemsSchedulerService`](src/infrastructure/services/expired-items-scheduler.service.ts:1) |
||||||
|
- **On startup**: Immediately processes expired items via `onModuleInit()` |
||||||
|
- **Every minute**: Runs via `@Cron(CronExpression.EVERY_MINUTE)` |
||||||
|
- **Daily at midnight**: Runs via `@Cron('0 0 * * *')` for daily processing |
||||||
|
- **Robust error handling**: Continues operation despite individual processing failures |
||||||
|
- **Comprehensive logging**: Tracks all scheduling activities |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Flow Integration**: |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
AppModule → ScheduleModule.forRoot() → ExpiredItemsSchedulerService |
||||||
|
↓ |
||||||
|
onModuleInit() → HandleExpiredItemsCommand.execute() [startup] |
||||||
|
↓ |
||||||
|
@Cron(EVERY_MINUTE) → HandleExpiredItemsCommand.execute() [continuous] |
||||||
|
↓ |
||||||
|
@Cron('0 0 * * *') → HandleExpiredItemsCommand.execute() [daily midnight] |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 🔍 Areas for Improvement |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 1. Framework Dependency in Application Layer |
||||||
|
The implementation intentionally violates the Clean Architecture principle of framework-independent application layer by using NestJS decorators (`@Injectable()`, `@Inject()`) in the application layer. This decision was made for several practical reasons: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Cleaner Construction**: NestJS's dependency injection system provides a clean and declarative way to manage dependencies, making the construction part of the application more maintainable and readable. |
||||||
|
- **Ecosystem Integration**: Leveraging NestJS's native DI system allows for better integration with the framework's features, including interceptors, guards, and lifecycle hooks. |
||||||
|
- **Community Standards**: This approach follows common practices in the NestJS community, making the code more familiar to developers experienced with the framework. |
||||||
|
- **Testing Support**: NestJS provides excellent testing utilities that work seamlessly with decorator-based dependency injection. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While this does create a framework dependency in the application layer, the trade-off is considered worthwhile for the benefits it provides in terms of development speed, maintainability, and framework integration. Alternative approaches like the Adapter Pattern or Factory Pattern could be used to make the application layer truly framework-agnostic, but they would introduce additional complexity and boilerplate code. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 2. Specification Pattern Consistency |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While the implementation is excellent, there's a minor inconsistency in the [`ItemExpirationSpec`](src/domain/specifications/item-expiration.spec.ts:4) class name. The file is named `item-expiration.spec.ts` but the class is `ItemExpirationSpec`. Consider renaming to `ItemExpirationSpecification` for consistency. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 3. Error Handling |
||||||
|
The application could benefit from custom domain exceptions instead of generic `Error` objects: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```typescript |
||||||
|
// Current approach |
||||||
|
throw new Error('Item name cannot be empty'); |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Suggested improvement |
||||||
|
throw new InvalidItemNameException('Item name cannot be empty'); |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 4. Domain Events |
||||||
|
Consider implementing domain events for the ordering process to better separate concerns: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```typescript |
||||||
|
// Instead of direct ordering in command |
||||||
|
await this.orderService.orderItem(item); |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Consider domain events |
||||||
|
domainEvents.publish(new ItemExpiredEvent(item)); |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 🎯 Comparison with PHP and C++ Implementations |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### PHP Implementation |
||||||
|
The PHP implementation follows a similar specification pattern but with some differences: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```php |
||||||
|
// PHP specification |
||||||
|
public function isExpired(Item $item, DateTimeImmutable $currentTime): bool |
||||||
|
{ |
||||||
|
return $this->getSpec($currentTime)->match($item); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
public function getSpec(DateTimeImmutable $currentTime): Specification |
||||||
|
{ |
||||||
|
return new Specification( |
||||||
|
Spec::lte('expirationDate', $currentTime->format('Y-m-d H:i:s')) |
||||||
|
); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Key Differences:** |
||||||
|
- PHP uses `DateTimeImmutable` vs TypeScript's `Date` |
||||||
|
- PHP specification includes SQL rendering capabilities in comments |
||||||
|
- Both maintain single source of truth effectively |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### C++ Implementation |
||||||
|
The C++ implementation uses a different approach with a policy pattern: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```cpp |
||||||
|
// C++ policy approach |
||||||
|
bool isExpired(const Item& item, const TimePoint& currentTime) const |
||||||
|
{ |
||||||
|
return item.expirationDate <= currentTime; |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
ItemExpirationSpec getExpiredSpecification(const TimePoint& currentTime) const |
||||||
|
{ |
||||||
|
return nxl::helpers::SpecificationBuilder() |
||||||
|
.field(FIELD_EXP_DATE) |
||||||
|
.lessOrEqual(currentTime) |
||||||
|
.build(); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Key Differences:** |
||||||
|
- C++ uses `std::chrono::system_clock::time_point` |
||||||
|
- C++ uses a builder pattern for specifications |
||||||
|
- Direct comparison in `isExpired` vs specification-based approach |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 🏆 Best Practices Demonstrated |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 1. Single Source of Truth |
||||||
|
**Excellent adherence** to the requirement that expiration checking logic exists in only one place: |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- ✅ Domain specification defines `expirationDate <= currentTime` logic |
||||||
|
- ✅ Application layer uses [`ItemExpirationSpec`](src/application/commands/handle-expired-items.command.ts:18) for business logic |
||||||
|
- ✅ Repository layer uses specifications for filtering without duplicating logic |
||||||
|
- ✅ No hardcoded expiration logic in controllers or infrastructure |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 2. SOLID Principles |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Single Responsibility Principle**: Each class has one reason to change |
||||||
|
- [`ItemEntity`](src/domain/entities/item.entity.ts:5): Manages item state and validation |
||||||
|
- [`ItemExpirationSpec`](src/domain/specifications/item-expiration.spec.ts:4): Manages expiration logic |
||||||
|
- [`FileItemRepository`](src/infrastructure/repositories/file-item-repository.ts:12): Manages persistence |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Open/Closed Principle**: Extension through specifications, not modification |
||||||
|
- New filtering criteria can be added via new specifications |
||||||
|
- Repository doesn't need modification for new query types |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Liskov Substitution Principle**: Interfaces are properly segregated |
||||||
|
- [`IItemRepository`](src/application/interfaces/item-repository.interface.ts:6) can be implemented by any storage mechanism |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Interface Segregation Principle**: Focused interfaces |
||||||
|
- [`ITimeProvider`](src/application/interfaces/time-provider.interface.ts:1): Single method interface |
||||||
|
- [`IOrderService`](src/application/interfaces/order-service.interface.ts:1): Focused on ordering |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Dependency Inversion Principle**: Dependencies on abstractions |
||||||
|
- Application layer depends on interfaces, not concrete implementations |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 3. Clean Architecture Boundaries |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Domain Layer**: No external dependencies |
||||||
|
- Pure TypeScript with no framework imports |
||||||
|
- Business logic isolated from infrastructure concerns |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Application Layer**: Orchestrates use cases |
||||||
|
- Depends only on domain layer and infrastructure interfaces |
||||||
|
- Commands and queries properly separated |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Infrastructure Layer**: Implements abstractions |
||||||
|
- [`FileItemRepository`](src/infrastructure/repositories/file-item-repository.ts:12) implements [`IItemRepository`](src/application/interfaces/item-repository.interface.ts:6) |
||||||
|
- [`SystemTimeProvider`](src/infrastructure/services/system-time.provider.ts:5) implements [`ITimeProvider`](src/application/interfaces/time-provider.interface.ts:1) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 🧪 Testing Quality |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The implementation includes comprehensive tests: |
||||||
|
- **Unit tests** for specifications with edge cases |
||||||
|
- **Integration tests** for repositories |
||||||
|
- **Boundary testing** for date/time scenarios |
||||||
|
- **Specification testing** to ensure single source of truth |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 🚀 Recommendations |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Maintain the Specification Pattern**: This is the strongest aspect of the implementation |
||||||
|
2. **Consider Domain Events**: For better separation of ordering concerns |
||||||
|
3. **Add Custom Exceptions**: For better error handling and domain expressiveness |
||||||
|
4. **Document Business Rules**: Add comments explaining why expired items are allowed (business requirement) |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Conclusion |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The NestJS implementation **excellently demonstrates** Clean Architecture principles and successfully maintains a **single source of truth** for domain knowledge. The specification pattern implementation is particularly strong, ensuring that expiration date checking logic (`date <= now`) exists in exactly one place in the codebase. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The architecture properly separates concerns, follows SOLID principles, and provides a solid foundation for the AutoStore application. The comparison with PHP and C++ implementations shows that while the technical details differ, all implementations successfully maintain the critical single source of truth requirement. |
||||||
@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ |
|||||||
import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common'; |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@Injectable() |
|
||||||
export class AppService { |
|
||||||
getHello(): string { |
|
||||||
return 'Hello World!'; |
|
||||||
} |
|
||||||
} |
|
||||||
@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ |
|||||||
|
export interface ILogger { |
||||||
|
log(message: string, context?: string): void; |
||||||
|
error(message: string, trace?: string, context?: string): void; |
||||||
|
warn(message: string, context?: string): void; |
||||||
|
debug(message: string, context?: string): void; |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
@ -1,28 +1,29 @@ |
|||||||
import { Injectable, Logger, Inject } from '@nestjs/common'; |
import { Injectable, Inject } from '@nestjs/common'; |
||||||
import { ItemEntity } from '../../domain/entities/item.entity'; |
import { ItemEntity } from '../../domain/entities/item.entity'; |
||||||
import { UserId } from '../../domain/value-objects/user-id.vo'; |
import { UserId } from '../../domain/value-objects/user-id.vo'; |
||||||
import { IItemRepository } from '../interfaces/item-repository.interface'; |
import { IItemRepository } from '../interfaces/item-repository.interface'; |
||||||
|
import { LoggerService } from '../services/logger.service'; |
||||||
|
|
||||||
@Injectable() |
@Injectable() |
||||||
export class ListItemsQuery { |
export class ListItemsQuery { |
||||||
private readonly logger = new Logger(ListItemsQuery.name); |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
constructor( |
constructor( |
||||||
@Inject('IItemRepository') |
@Inject('IItemRepository') |
||||||
private readonly itemRepository: IItemRepository, |
private readonly itemRepository: IItemRepository, |
||||||
|
@Inject(LoggerService) |
||||||
|
private readonly logger: LoggerService, |
||||||
) {} |
) {} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
async execute(userId: string): Promise<ItemEntity[]> { |
async execute(userId: string): Promise<ItemEntity[]> { |
||||||
try { |
try { |
||||||
this.logger.log(`Listing items for user: ${userId}`); |
this.logger.log(`Listing items for user: ${userId}`, ListItemsQuery.name); |
||||||
|
|
||||||
const userIdVo = UserId.create(userId); |
const userIdVo = UserId.create(userId); |
||||||
const items = await this.itemRepository.findByUserId(userIdVo); |
const items = await this.itemRepository.findByUserId(userIdVo); |
||||||
|
|
||||||
this.logger.log(`Successfully retrieved ${items.length} items for user: ${userId}`); |
this.logger.log(`Successfully retrieved ${items.length} items for user: ${userId}`, ListItemsQuery.name); |
||||||
return items; |
return items; |
||||||
} catch (error) { |
} catch (error) { |
||||||
this.logger.error(`Failed to list items for user ${userId}: ${error.message}`); |
this.logger.error(`Failed to list items for user ${userId}: ${error.message}`, undefined, ListItemsQuery.name); |
||||||
throw new Error(`Failed to list items: ${error.message}`); |
throw new Error(`Failed to list items: ${error.message}`); |
||||||
} |
} |
||||||
} |
} |
||||||
|
|||||||
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ |
|||||||
|
import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common'; |
||||||
|
import { ILogger } from '../interfaces/logger.interface'; |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Injectable() |
||||||
|
export abstract class LoggerService implements ILogger { |
||||||
|
abstract log(message: string, context?: string): void; |
||||||
|
abstract error(message: string, trace?: string, context?: string): void; |
||||||
|
abstract warn(message: string, context?: string): void; |
||||||
|
abstract debug(message: string, context?: string): void; |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ |
|||||||
|
import { Injectable, Logger } from '@nestjs/common'; |
||||||
|
import { LoggerService } from '../../application/services/logger.service'; |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Injectable() |
||||||
|
export class NestLoggerService extends LoggerService { |
||||||
|
private readonly logger = new Logger(NestLoggerService.name); |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
log(message: string, context?: string): void { |
||||||
|
this.logger.log(message, context); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error(message: string, trace?: string, context?: string): void { |
||||||
|
this.logger.error(message, trace, context); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
warn(message: string, context?: string): void { |
||||||
|
this.logger.warn(message, context); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
debug(message: string, context?: string): void { |
||||||
|
this.logger.debug(message, context); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ |
|||||||
|
import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common'; |
||||||
|
import { LoggerService } from '../../application/services/logger.service'; |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Injectable() |
||||||
|
export class NullLoggerService extends LoggerService { |
||||||
|
log(message: string, context?: string): void { |
||||||
|
// No-op for testing
|
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
error(message: string, trace?: string, context?: string): void { |
||||||
|
// No-op for testing
|
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
warn(message: string, context?: string): void { |
||||||
|
// No-op for testing
|
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
debug(message: string, context?: string): void { |
||||||
|
// No-op for testing
|
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ |
|||||||
|
import { Injectable, OnModuleInit } from '@nestjs/common'; |
||||||
|
import { Cron, CronExpression } from '@nestjs/schedule'; |
||||||
|
import { HandleExpiredItemsCommand } from '../../application/commands/handle-expired-items.command'; |
||||||
|
import { LoggerService } from '../../application/services/logger.service'; |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Injectable() |
||||||
|
export class ExpiredItemsSchedulerService implements OnModuleInit { |
||||||
|
constructor( |
||||||
|
private readonly handleExpiredItemsCommand: HandleExpiredItemsCommand, |
||||||
|
private readonly logger: LoggerService, |
||||||
|
) {} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
async onModuleInit(): Promise<void> { |
||||||
|
this.logger.log('ExpiredItemsSchedulerService initialized', ExpiredItemsSchedulerService.name); |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Process expired items immediately on startup
|
||||||
|
try { |
||||||
|
this.logger.log('Processing expired items on startup...', ExpiredItemsSchedulerService.name); |
||||||
|
await this.handleExpiredItemsCommand.execute(); |
||||||
|
this.logger.log('Startup expired items processing completed', ExpiredItemsSchedulerService.name); |
||||||
|
} catch (error) { |
||||||
|
this.logger.error(`Failed to process expired items on startup: ${error.message}`, undefined, ExpiredItemsSchedulerService.name); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Cron(CronExpression.EVERY_MINUTE) |
||||||
|
async handleExpiredItemsCron(): Promise<void> { |
||||||
|
try { |
||||||
|
this.logger.log('Starting scheduled expired items processing', ExpiredItemsSchedulerService.name); |
||||||
|
await this.handleExpiredItemsCommand.execute(); |
||||||
|
this.logger.log('Scheduled expired items processing completed', ExpiredItemsSchedulerService.name); |
||||||
|
} catch (error) { |
||||||
|
this.logger.error(`Failed to process expired items: ${error.message}`, undefined, ExpiredItemsSchedulerService.name); |
||||||
|
// Continue running despite errors - don't let one failure stop the scheduler
|
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Cron('0 0 * * *') // Every day at midnight
|
||||||
|
async handleExpiredItemsDaily(): Promise<void> { |
||||||
|
try { |
||||||
|
this.logger.log('Starting daily expired items processing at midnight', ExpiredItemsSchedulerService.name); |
||||||
|
await this.handleExpiredItemsCommand.execute(); |
||||||
|
this.logger.log('Daily expired items processing completed', ExpiredItemsSchedulerService.name); |
||||||
|
} catch (error) { |
||||||
|
this.logger.error(`Failed to process expired items at midnight: ${error.message}`, undefined, ExpiredItemsSchedulerService.name); |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
|
} |
||||||
Loading…
Reference in new issue